8th
This is the way to pick em…
I met Fabrice Grinda at the MaiTai event. We were talking about all sorts of different interesting businesses. He told me that he has 9 criterias for picking the next thing that he goes into. The list is awesome and fortunately he blogged it because I could not remember all 9:
1. At least a $1 billion addressable market This does not mean that the market must be a $1 billion market at the launch of the company, but that it must have the potential. When I created Aucland, the online auction market was small, but the offline used goods markets were multi-billion dollar markets in their own right suggesting that the online market would be large enough if a certain percentage of the trading went online. 2. A valid business model understood from the get go For clarification purposes, by having a valid business model I mean understanding how you are going to generate money and having a good sense of the gross and net margins at the creation of the company. 3. Does not require more than $2 million in seed or $15 million in first round VC money 4. A business where you have a real shot at being one of the top players – at least in the region you are targeting 5. A scalable idea 6. A business with little or no risk of disintermediation and/or margin compression by suppliers and/or customers 7. A business that is in a rapidly growing market 8. An idea that I know how to execute on or can learn how to execute on 9. An idea that I like and want to do!
This criteria is inherently personal and depends on the entrepreneur’s ambition, but there are good reasons to target larger markets:
There is only a 5% chance that a company created today will still be around in 5 years. I have not seen official statistics, but many VCs seem to believe that only 0.1% of the company started without a valid business model succeed. It’s so risky to create a company to begin with, I would rather have all the odds in my favor… I realize that Google is a counter example, but in an upcoming post I will describe how they got lucky.
If it requires much more, the business might be too capital intensive which could lead to too much dillution and suggest that this is an idea that is easier for a large incumbent to fund rather than a new startup.
Avoid entering businesses where many players are well funded or where the incumbents have a sustainable advantage. That is not to say not to enter businesses where there are incumbents – just make you have a hard to replicate edge on them – after all Skype did extremely well because it entered the telephony market with a radically lower cost structure than the traditional telcos and used it to its advantage.
This is again a very personal criteria. Walmart and Starbucks are great businesses, but I would rather not be in a business where I need to open a new store to increase my sales as it leads to slower growth and greater capital requirements. Internet businesses are magical as they give you the ability to build and grow global companies in record times – just look at what Google, eBay, Skype and many others accomplished in less than 10 years – in some cases in less than 5 years!
You are in a much safer position if you are much larger than your customers and/or suppliers. Walmart exerts tremendous pressure on its suppliers which are much smaller than it is and depend on its sales. eBay can also continuously increase prices on its sellers – none of which is in a meaningful position to fight back on its own. Zingy violated this criteria and this is one of the main reasons I sold the company as I hated having so much of the revenues coming from the top 3 carriers in the US and so much of the costs generated by the top music labels.
A rising tide raises all boats. Growing markets generate more interest from the press, consumers, customers and suppliers. Moreover, if you are gaining share in a rapidly growing market, this can create exponential growth.
For now I will probably focus on technology ideas as I have a clear comparative advantage in the field as I understand technology and know how to manage technology organizations. This probably excludes biotechnology for me – if five teams present me their cure for prostate cancer I can tell you which presents the best and has the slickest Powerpoint presentation, but I can’t really say which is best positioned to win.
One of the keys to happiness and success in life is to do things you love and are passionate about…
